Defaults and Normality in Causal Structures
نویسنده
چکیده
A serious defect with the Halpern-Pearl (HP) definition of causality is repaired by combining a theory of causality with a theory of defaults. In addition, it is shown that (despite a claim to the contrary) a cause according to the HP condition need not be a single conjunct. A definition of causality motivated by Wright’s NESS test is shown to always hold for a single conjunct. Moreover, conditions that hold for all the examples considered by HP are given that guarantee that causality according to (this version) of the NESS test is equivalent to the HP definition.
منابع مشابه
Graded Causation and Defaults
Recent work in psychology and experimental philosophy has shown that judgments of actual causation are often influenced by consideration of defaults, typicality, and normality. A number of philosophers and computer scientists have also suggested that an appeal to such factors can help deal with problems facing existing accounts of actual causation. This paper develops a flexible formal framewor...
متن کاملDoxastic Normality Logic: A Qualitative Probabilistic Modal Framework for Defaults and Belief
We propose a new semantics for modeling belief, mixing conncepts from qualitative probabilistic and classical possible world accounts. Our belief structures are coherent sets of qualitative plausibility measures and belief corresponds to truth in the most plausible worlds of each epistemic alternative. We provide an axiomatic characterization of these doxastic structures in a bimodal language, ...
متن کاملCausal Default Reasoning: Principles and Algorithms
The minimal model semantics is a natural interpretation of defaults yet it often yields a behavior that is too weak. This weakness has been traced to the inabiity of minimal models to reflect certain implicit preferences among defaults, in particular, preferences for defaults grounded on more ‘specific’ information and preferences arising in causal domains. Recently, ‘specificity’ preferences h...
متن کاملWhat’s in a Default? Thoughts on the Nature and Role of Defaults in Nonmonotonic Reasoning
This paper examines the role and meaning of defaults in nonmonotonic reasoning (NMR). Defaults, that is, statements that express a condition of normally such as “adults are normally employed”, are crucial in commonsense reasoning and in artificial intelligence in general. The majority of research concerning defaults has focussed on (default) inference mechanisms, rather than representational is...
متن کاملCompact Representations of Extended Causal Models
Judea Pearl (2000) was the first to propose a definition of actual causation using causal models. A number of authors have suggested that an adequate account of actual causation must appeal not only to causal structure but also to considerations of normality. In Halpern and Hitchcock (2011), we offer a definition of actual causation using extended causal models, which include information about ...
متن کامل